{"id":620,"date":"2012-06-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-06-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","slug":"","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/?p=620","title":{"rendered":"Turkey: Ensure safety of Syrian refugees and access for national and international monitors"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Amnesty  International has written to the Turkish authorities with concerns regarding some  aspects of the protection afforded to Syrian refugees in Turkey. Over 26,500  refugees are accommodated in camps in 10 locations by the Turkish authorities.<\/p>\n<p>In  addition to the 26,500 Syrian refugees who are being accommodated in Turkey, Syrian refugees are being hosted in  other neighbouring countries including Jordan  and Lebanon.  Whilst exact figures are unclear, the UN Refugee agency- UNHCR and local NGOs  estimate that there are between 25,000- 50,000 Syrians in Lebanon and some 15,000-20,000 Syrians in Jordan.  Amnesty International is also closely monitoring the situation for Syrian  refugees in neighbouring countries. <\/p>\n<p>In the  letter to the Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs, Amnesty International welcomed  the fact that refugees were allowed to enter and stay in Turkey in line  with the international law principle of <em>non-refoulement<\/em>.  Amnesty International also welcomed efforts made by the government to tend to  the Syrian refugees\u2019 most immediate needs by providing them with accommodation,  food, material assistance and medical care. <\/p>\n<p>Amnesty  International also raised concerns with the authorities regarding the location  of the camps which are in close proximity to the Syrian border, deficiencies in  registration and screening of new arrivals, the limited access to the camps for  the UN\u2019s refugee agency, the UNHCR and independent human rights organizations and  some aspects of the protection regime.<\/p>\n<p><strong>CAMP<\/strong><strong> LOCATION<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><br \/>\n  Presently,  Syrian refugees are accommodated in 10 camps in four border provinces in Hatay, Gaziantep,  Kilis and Urfa. The close proximity of the camps to the border with Syria poses a  serious security threat to those living there. The reported injuries among  refugees at or near the Kilis camp in April 2012 caused by stray bullets from  clashes in Syria  are a tragic illustration of the dangers to refugees which the camps\u2019 proximity  to the border gives rise. <\/p>\n<p>According  to international standards, in order to safeguard the physical security of  refugees, camps should be located at a reasonable distance from the frontiers  of the countries of origin, at least 50 kilometres from the border.\u00a0 <\/p>\n<p>Amnesty  International acknowledges that while there may be logistical and practical  challenges and considerations in relation to where the camps are located, the  primary consideration should be the physical safety of the refugees. Drawing  attention to the Turkish government\u2019s primary responsibility for the safety and  security of Syrian refugees in Turkey, Amnesty International urges the  authorities to re-locate the camps to a reasonable and safe distance from the  border with Syria in order to minimise any actual or potential threats and  risks to refugees\u2019 security as a result of fighting close to the border and to  avoid exposing people to further harm.<\/p>\n<p>Amnesty  International considers that the close proximity of the refugee camps to the  border with Syria  is also directly detrimental to the Turkish authorities\u2019 ability to ensure that  the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and refugee camps is not  compromised. <\/p>\n<p>Amnesty  International considers that task of ensuring the civilian and humanitarian  character of asylum and refugee camps, as well as ensuring the security and  protection of refugees, would be greatly enhanced by re-locating the camps at a  reasonable distance from the border. In addition, strengthening registration  and screening procedures for new arrivals would increase the Turkish  authorities\u2019 ability to prevent infiltration of and ensure subversive  activities are not carried out in the camps. <\/p>\n<p>Registration  and screening procedures <br \/>\n  In  addition to furthering the objective of seeking to maintain the civilian and  humanitarian character of asylum and refugee camps, effective registration and  screening procedures &#8211; which should include the disarmament of armed elements  and the identification and separation of combatants &#8211; serve as an important  protection tool in a number of other ways, as has been recognised by the United  Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). For example, such procedures  may be used as a means to prevent instances of <em>refoulement<\/em> and forcible recruitment, and also to ensure access to  basic rights, family reunification, and to identify and respond to those  refugees with specific vulnerabilities or protection needs. <\/p>\n<p>Improved  screening and registration would also ensure that special measures can be put  in place for those refugees who may be facing particular risks or  vulnerabilities including women, children, the elderly and persons with  disabilities. They may also be especially pertinent to individuals or groups  who continue to be at risk or have protection concerns in the camps and\/or who  have long-term protection needs. In such circumstances, in particular,  individuals should have prompt, safe and unimpeded access to UNHCR and  individualised refugee status determination (RSD) procedures should they wish,  beyond the current regime of temporary protection. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Camp<\/strong><strong> Access<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><br \/>\n  Amnesty  International urges the Government to put in place a formal arrangement to  ensure the access of intergovernmental organization investigators or government  investigation teams so that they can investigate allegations of crimes under  international law and other human rights abuses by all parties in Syria and do  so in a way that does not endanger those cooperating with them in such  investigations. <\/p>\n<p>Amnesty  International is concerned however that access to the camps for UNHCR has been  restricted and that access for human rights civil society organizations has  been denied.<\/p>\n<p>UNHCR has  been given some access to the camps and has been able to provide some technical  advice. However, we understand that camp management as well as screening and  registration procedures are delivered solely by your Government, via the  Turkish Red Crescent, without any official, systematic and institutionalised  monitoring of the same by UNHCR officials. <\/p>\n<p>According  to the Statute of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for  Refugees, UNHCR is recognised as the competent agency to pursue protection, assistanceand solutions for refugees. States have a duty to cooperate with  UNHCR, who can only effectively discharge their mandate if they have access to  the camp populations.<\/p>\n<p>In light  of this, Amnesty International is concerned at UNHCR\u2019s lack of access to the  refugee population in the camps. This hinders its ability to systematically  supervise Turkey\u2019s  implementation of its international obligations towards the Syrian refugees  currently hosted in the camps, including by monitoring and advising those  carrying out registration and screening procedures. All of those activities are  critical to the UNHCR\u2019s discharge of its mandate. <\/p>\n<p>In the  current circumstances, vulnerable and at-risk refugees do not have access to  UNHCR for advice, assistance or the possibility of accessing individualised RSD  procedures. <\/p>\n<p>It is also  of concern that the Government has not yet permitted human rights  organisations, including Amnesty International, to access the camps to meet  with Syrian refugees there and to gather information pertaining to the ongoing  crisis in Syria.  Letters were sent by Amnesty International to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs  on 10 June 2011, 28 June 2011, 11 October 2011 and 30 March 2012 respectively,  requesting assistance to access the camps. To date, Amnesty International has  not been granted permission to enter the camps. The only response from the  Ministry dated 4 April 2012, stated that in view of Turkey\u2019s cooperation with the  international community, no individual applications for entry to the camps  would be accepted.\u00a0 <\/p>\n<p>For over a  year, grave and systemic human rights violations, amounting to crimes against  humanity, have been carried out against civilians in Syria. Amnesty International believes  that many among the refugees currently hosted in the camps in Turkey may have  witnessed or have information on such violations, and that they should be given  access to human rights organisations, including Amnesty International, in order  to provide their testimony should they wish to. <\/p>\n<p>Amnesty  International requests that human rights organisations are given access to all  locations where refugees are accommodated in order to obtain testimonies, carry  out research pertaining to the ongoing human rights abuses taking place in Syria, and to  independently monitor conditions and structures in the camps. <\/p>\n<p>Amnesty  International is concerned that the current government policy of refusing  access to independent civil society organizations both unfairly restricts the  refugees\u2019 rights, and is counter-productive. The refusal to grant access  unfairly curtails Syrian refugees\u2019 right to speak out regarding the situation  in Syria.  Furthermore, while reports indicate that the camps are well managed and that  conditions are good, the refusal to allow independent monitoring may also give  rise to suspicion that any concerns regarding conditions in the camps are being  suppressed.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n<p>Temporary  Protection<br \/>\n  Amnesty  International recognises that, in line with UNHCR guidance on such matters, in  some instances of large scale displacement, <em>at  the very least <\/em>it is important to establish a temporary protection  regime.\u00a0 Whilst we are aware that there  may be logistical and practical challenges and considerations vis a vis where  the camps are located, the primary consideration should be the physical safety  of the refugees which at a minimum ensures admission, protection against <em>refoulement <\/em>and access to basic  provisions. While Amnesty International notes that the Turkish authorities have  put in place a temporary protection regime, it is concerned that temporary  protection may not be appropriate for those refugees who have long-term  protection needs, and who will need and be entitled to durable solutions for  their displacement. In such circumstances, these individuals should be  identified at the earliest possible time and have the opportunity to go through  full RSD procedures and be enabled to access the possibility of an appropriate  durable solution. Amnesty International is concerned that a failure to identify  individuals in need of long-term protection may put them at risk of <em>refoulement <\/em>in the medium to long term. <\/p>\n<p>Recommendations<br \/>\n  Amnesty  International urges the government to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"> <\/span>ensure that all refugee camps are re-located at  a reasonable and safe distance from the frontier with Syria in order  to ensure the physical safety of refugees;<\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"> <\/span>enhance and improve monitoring, screening and  registration of new arrivals so as to preserve the civilian and humanitarian  character of asylum and refugee camps; <\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"> <\/span>ensure that screening and registration are  carried out in order to identify and assist particular groups who may be at  risk, have long-term protection needs; <\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"> <\/span>provide information to all new arrivals on the  temporary protection regime and their rights as refugees;<\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"> <\/span>ensure that all refugees have full and  unimpeded access to UNHCR, in particular refugees who wish to access an  individualised RSD procedure, or whom otherwise wish to access UNHCR;<\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"> <\/span>allow UNHCR to effectively discharge its  mandate vis-a-vis the refugee population and in particular exercise its refugee  protection functions; <\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"> <\/span>ensure that intergovernmental organization  investigators and government investigation teams can investigate without  hindrance allegations of crimes under international law and other human rights  abuses by all parties in Syria;<\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"> <\/span>provide information of the presence of the investigators  and ways in which they can provide information to them in complete security;<\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"> <\/span>grant access for human rights and other civil  society organizations, including Amnesty International, to all locations  hosting Syrian refugee populations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Amnesty International, Public Statement, 12 June 2012<\/p>\n<p>Amnesty International has written to the Turkish authorities with concerns regarding some aspects of the protection afforded to Syrian refugees in Turkey. Over 26,500 refugees are accommodated in camps in 10 locations by the Turkish authorities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-620","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}