{"id":504,"date":"2012-03-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-03-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","slug":"","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/?p=504","title":{"rendered":"Russia: Selective Use of Syria Findings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>March 23, 2012 <br \/>\n  (New York) \u2013 Human  Rights Watch issued the following statement on March 23, 2012, concerning the  Russian Foreign Ministry&rsquo;s use of a Human Rights Watch statement to support a  one-sided position on Syria:<\/p>\n<p>  In its March 22, 2012 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sana.sy\/eng\/22\/2012\/03\/22\/407658.htm\">statement<\/a> , Russia&rsquo;s Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed its &ldquo;deep concern&rdquo; over human  rights violations committed by armed groups affiliated with the Syrian  opposition, extensively citing an open letter on this issue <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hrw.org\/news\/2012\/03\/20\/syria-armed-opposition-groups-committing-abuses\">published  by Human Rights Watch<\/a> . Human Rights Watch also learned that Russian  diplomats used the open letter in informal Security Council discussions on March  22 in an attempt to equate the violence by both sides.<\/p>\n<p>  Russia&rsquo;s attention to concerns expressed in the letter to the Syrian opposition  is a positive development. Human Rights Watch is committed to objective  documentation and exposing abuses by all sides in Syria. The selective use of  the findings, however, causes serious concern.<\/p>\n<p>  Since the beginning of the protests in Syria, Human Rights Watch has produced  over 60 publications, including three extensive reports, on human rights  violations by Syrian government forces. These publications contain detailed  documentation of widespread and systematic abuses, including killings of  peaceful protesters, shelling of residential neighborhoods, large-scale  arbitrary detention and torture, &ldquo;disappearances,&rdquo; executions, denial of  medical assistance, and looting.<\/p>\n<p>  Human Rights Watch concluded that that some of these violations constitute  crimes against humanity and repeatedly called for an end to abuses and  accountability for the perpetrators. Human Rights Watch presented the findings  directly to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, urging Russia to use its  strong bilateral relations with the Syrian government as well as its weight in  the international arena to put an end to government abuses.<\/p>\n<p>  None of these findings have been ever acknowledged by Russian officials.<\/p>\n<p>  Instead, despite overwhelming evidence of egregious crimes committed by the  Syrian security forces, Russia provides diplomatic and military support to  Bashar al-Assad&rsquo;s government and has repeatedly blocked international action  aimed at stopping the violations and bringing those responsible for these  crimes to justice.<\/p>\n<p>  Abuses by opposition fighters are also not an argument for the international  community, including Russia, to wash its hands of the Syria crisis, on the  grounds that it is too complicated. On the contrary, they are an argument for  intensifying pressure on the Syrian government to stop its abuses.<\/p>\n<p>  Russia should not pick and choose. If it relies on Human Rights Watch&rsquo;s  findings to support its condemnation of abuses by the Syrian opposition, it  should pay equal attention to the extensive documentation of violations by  government forces and support international efforts to stop those violations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source URL:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hrw.org\/news\/2012\/03\/23\/russia-selective-use-syria-findings\">http:\/\/www.hrw.org\/news\/2012\/03\/23\/russia-selective-use-syria-findings<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>March 23, 2012 <\/p>\n<p>\u00a0(New  York) \u2013 Human Rights Watch issued the following statement on March 23, 2012,  concerning the Russian Foreign Ministry\u2019s use of a Human Rights Watch statement  to support a one-sided position on Syria:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-504","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=504"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/504\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}