{"id":388,"date":"2011-10-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-10-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","slug":"","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/?p=388","title":{"rendered":"The United Kingdom, Norway, Poland and Japan challenge Syria\u2019s assessment that their recommendations are already implemented"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n&nbsp;\n<\/p>\n<p>\nMonday 17 October 2011\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  On Tuesday 11 October, the United Kingdom, Norway, Poland  and Japan took the floor during the adoption of Syria&rsquo;s Working Group Report to  contest the delegation&rsquo;s decision to consider their recommendations as already  implemented.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  In the Report of Working Group of Syria&rsquo;s review,  recommendations are clustered into six categories: those which enjoy the  support of the delegation, those which are already implemented, those which are  in the process of implementation, those to which the delegation will respond at  the 19th Human Rights Council session in March 2012, those which do not enjoy  its support and those which do not enjoy its support because they are &ldquo;based on  incorrect assumption or premises&rdquo;.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  The second category of recommendations already implemented,  paragraph 109, contains 27 recommendations. 10 of them were made by the United  Kingdom, Norway, Poland and Japan on issues of humanitarian workers, detention  conditions, freedom of opinion and expression and freedom of association and  peaceful assembly.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nEarlier during the adoption, the troika  announced that recommendation 109.6 by Poland calling on to put an end to all  human rights violations was moved from paragraph 109 to 110 which clusters  recommendations in the process of implementation.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\nMonday 17 October 2011\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  On Tuesday 11 October, the United Kingdom, Norway, Poland  and Japan took the floor during the adoption of Syria&rsquo;s Working Group Report to  contest the delegation&rsquo;s decision to consider their recommendations as already  implemented.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":43,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/43"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/388\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}