{"id":1102,"date":"2013-01-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-01-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","slug":"","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/?p=1102","title":{"rendered":"ICC Membership Can Protect Arab Spring Gains"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Leila Hanafi and Haidi Sadik*<\/p>\n<p>  Jan 03, 2013<\/p>\n<p>  The tumultuous events of the Arab Spring have been driven by  a desire for justice among long-oppressed populations. As new governments come  to power across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), an unprecedented  opportunity has emerged to promote the rule of law and accountability.<\/p>\n<p>  To take advantage of this opening and protect democratic  gains, new Arab government have become increasingly interested in joining the  International Criminal Court (ICC). &nbsp;Based in The Hague, the ICC was  established 10 years ago to prosecute individuals responsible for genocide, war  crimes, and crimes against humanity<\/p>\n<p>  Under the umbrella of the Coalition for the ICC\u2014a global  network of non-governmental organizations\u2014MENA civil society has been working  to harness the region\u2019s increasing momentum toward justice to convince regional  government to join the Court.<\/p>\n<p>  In November 2012, Arab civil society leaders attended the  annual meeting of the ICC\u2019s governing body\u2014known as the Assembly of States  Parties (ASP). There, these leaders met with states and other stakeholders to  discuss ways to raise awareness about the ICC in the MENA region and promote  the benefits of ratifying the Rome Statute, the ICC\u2019s founding treaty.\n  <\/p>\n<p>Historically, most Arab states have expressed interest in  the Court\u2019s work. Nevertheless, despite the number of ICC crimes in the region,  only one Arab state, Jordan, had accepted the ICC\u2019s jurisdiction before the  Arab Spring. As a result, in MENA, accountability for grave crimes has long  been absent, and impunity the norm.\n  <\/p>\n<p>Since the start of the Arab Spring, hope has emerged for  renewed regional interest in ending impunity for grave international crimes.  Significantly, after the fall of Tunisian President Zine el Abidine Ben Ali,  ratification of the Rome Statute was one of the first acts taken by Tunisia\u2019s  interim government. In addition, during the early part of the Libyan  revolution, the UN Security Council used its power under the Rome Statute to  give the ICC jurisdiction over crimes committed by Muammar Ghaddafi and several  other Libyan officials.\n  <\/p>\n<p>The ICC is often described as a court of last resort.  Indeed, its work complements national jurisdictions and is triggered, by and  large, only when member states are genuinely unwilling or unable to investigate  and prosecute grave crimes.\n  <\/p>\n<p>As such, ICC membership can act as a catalyst for national  judicial reform, spurring states\u2014such as Tunisia\u2014to enact legislation that  reflects a responsibility to ensure accountability for grave crimes at the  national level. In turn, civil society monitors ensure that governments follow  through on their commitments to combat impunity, and advance good governance  and the rule of law.\n  <\/p>\n<p>Whether struggling for freedom from authoritarian regimes\u2014in  Syria for example\u2014or debating post-revolutionary futures\u2014in Tunisia, Libya or  Egypt\u2014justice reform has been one of the major pillars of the Arab Spring.  Strengthening the rule of law\u2014be it in the shape of constitutional reform, ratification  and implementation of international treaties, or the prosecution of former or  current state leaders\u2014is highly contested and has contributed to ongoing  political upheaval across the region.<br \/>\n  In Libya, for instance, there is division on the best path  toward accountability for former members of the Gaddafi regime. Some advocate  for ICC suspects Saif Al Islam and Abdallah al-Senussi to be turned over to the  Court, while others call for domestic prosecutions. Irrespective of the  outcome, these debates are a clear example of how international justice impacts  people\u2019s perceptions of accountability.\n  <\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, because of divisions within the UN Security  Council, the ICC has been unable to take action against the escalating conflict  in Syria. At the November 2012 ASP meeting, Radwan Ziadeh, director of the  Damascus Center for Human Rights Studies, urged all 121 ICC member states to  support an initiative, launched by Switzerland in June 2012, calling for the UN  Security Council to refer Syria\u2014which has not accepted the ICC\u2019s  jurisdiction\u2014to the Court. Ziadeh also urged Council members to put aside their  differences in the interest of justice.\n  <\/p>\n<p>The Syrian situation starkly underscores the urgent need for  all Arab states to ratify the Rome Statute, namely, to avoid leaving victims of  grave crimes at the mercy of international politics. Increased engagement with  the ICC and Rome Statute also reinforces the justice reform agenda in Arab  states, which are increasingly recognizing the rule of law and protection of  human rights as the most effective long-term solutions to many social and  political problems.\n  <\/p>\n<p>Joining the ICC would go a long way toward furthering the  legitimacy of post-Arab Spring governments. By joining the ICC and implementing  its provisions into national law, new Arab regimes would demonstrate their  commitment to the calls for justice underpinning the region\u2019s uprisings. Arab  support would also help the Court itself, which needs the involvement of  regional governments, civil society and the wider public to carry out its  critical mandate.\n  <\/p>\n<p>November\u2019s meeting of ICC member states was a valuable  opportunity for MENA civil society groups to strategize about ways to convince  new Arab governments to end impunity for grave crimes by joining the Court and  establishing a strong and independent rule of law at the national level.<br \/>\n  At the current historical juncture, Arab leaders are faced  with a unique chance not only to bring justice to perpetrators of grave crimes,  but also to establish a lasting legacy of accountability for future governments  built on the accomplishments of the Arab Spring.<\/p>\n<p><em>*Leila Hanafi is the Middle East and North Africa Legal  Coordinator for the Coalition for the International Criminal Court, which  convened the Middle East and North Africa Strategy Consultations at the 11th  ASP in The Hague, Netherlands, November 14-22nd.<\/em>\n<\/p>\n<p><em>Haidi Sadik is an Egyptian-Dutch International  Development Specialist and member of the organizing team of the Middle East and  North Africa Strategy Consultations at the 11th ASP in The Hague, Netherlands,  November 14-22nd.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Source URL: <a href=\"http:\/\/muftah.org\/icc-membership-can-protect-arab-spring-gains\/\">http:\/\/muftah.org\/icc-membership-can-protect-arab-spring-gains\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Leila Hanafi and Haidi Sadik* &#8211; Jan 03, 2013<\/p>\n<p>  The tumultuous events of the Arab Spring have been driven by  a desire for justice among long-oppressed populations. As new governments come  to power across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), an unprecedented  opportunity has emerged to promote the rule of law and accountability.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":76,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1102","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1102","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/76"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1102"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1102\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1102"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dchrs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}